U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Chestnut

United States v. Chestnut
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2013 · Motz, Shedd, Wilkinson
534 F. App'x 189

United States v. Chestnut

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Chestnut’s motions to seal and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *190the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.