U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Williams v. Circuit Court for Suffolk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2013 · Davis, Gregory, Thacker

536 F. App'x 318

Counsel

Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Williams v. Clarke (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s orders remanding his state prosecutions to state court and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Circuit Court for City of Suffolk, No. 3:11-cv-00125-HEH (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2012; Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court, No. 3:12-cv-00078-HEH (E.D.Va. Dec. 7, 2012 & Apr. 29, *3192013)). We also deny Williams’ motion for leave to file a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.