U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Pratt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2013 · Davis, Gregory, Thacker

536 F. App'x 320

Counsel

James Edward Pratt, Appellant pro se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Pratt appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pratt, No. 1:00-cr-00027-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.