U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Ashraf

United States v. Ashraf
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2013
537 F. App'x 197

Counsel

Zaman Ashraf, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Ashraf

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Zaman Ashraf appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ashraf, No. 3:03-cr-00458-REP-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.