U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Valerino v. Holder

Valerino v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 19, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wilkinson
539 F. App'x 256

Counsel

Linda I. Valerino, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Elizabeth Cross, Office of the United States Attorney, Kevin J. Mikolashek, R. Joseph Sher, Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Valerino v. Holder

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Linda I. Valerino appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination case arising from Valerino’s employment with the United States Marshals Service. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. Valerino v. Holder, No. 1:11-cv-01124-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. Feb. 20, 2018). We deny Valerino’s motion for leave to file exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.