U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Rivers v. Hodge

Rivers v. Hodge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2013 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Thacker
539 F. App'x 306

Rivers v. Hodge

Opinion of the Court

*307Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Herman F. Rivers, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Rivers’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivers v. Hodge, No. 1:11-cv-00644-CMH-TRJ, 2013 WL 989957 (E.D.Va. filed Mar. 12, 2013, and entered Mar. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.