Childress v. First Citizens Bank
Childress v. First Citizens Bank
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tessa Childress appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging a violation of the federal Wiretap Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Childress’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Chil-dress has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.