United States v. Chestnut
United States v. Chestnut
540 F. App'x 161
United States v. Chestnut
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s text order denying his Motion Preserving Error Under Rule 51(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Chestnut, No. 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.