U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Puryear v. Shrader

Puryear v. Shrader
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 2013 · Diaz, Floyd, Motz
541 F. App'x 242

Counsel

Anita Puryear, Appellant pro se., Andrew George Warrens Norman, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Puryear v. Shrader

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anita Puryear appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puryear v. Shrader, No. 8:11-cv-03640-PJM, 2013 WL 1833262 (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.