Cordero v. City of Columbia
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Johnnie Cordero appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cordero’s complaint alleging violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cordero v. City of Columbia, No. 3:11-cv-02502-JFA, 2013 WL 1282061 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Johnnie CORDERO v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, The, South Carolina Joseph H. Timmons, III, individually and in his official capacity as Risk Manager of the City of Columbia South Carolina also known as Chip Hattie M. Bing, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Director of the City of Columbia Department of Parks and Recreation S. Alison Baker, individually and in his official capacity as Senior Assistant City Manager and Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation of the City of Columbia South Carolina Jacque Gilliam, individually Pamela Benjamin, in her official capacity as Director of Human Resources for the City of Columbia South Carolina, and Jacque Gilliam, in his official capacity as Director of Human Resources for the City of Columbia South Carolina
- Status
- Published