Ranjha v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Ranjha v. Holder, 544 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2013)

Ranjha v. Holder

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rubina Ranjha, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ranjha’s claims and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ranjha, (B.I.A.Jan.18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rubina RANJHA v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Status
Published