U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Thompson

United States v. Thompson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 2013 · Niemeyer, Thacker, Wilkinson
544 F. App'x 222

United States v. Thompson

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Carl Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. 1:03-cr-00477-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. June 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *223and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.