U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Spencer

United States v. Spencer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 6, 2013 · Diaz, Hamilton, Wilkinson
545 F. App'x 264

Counsel

Calvin Antonio Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Fritz, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Spencer

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Antonio Spencer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Spencer, Nos. 2:92-er-00026-BO-1; 2:12-cv-00034-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.