U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Smith v. Spivey

Smith v. Spivey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 8, 2013 · Agee, Diaz, Wynn
546 F. App'x 174

Smith v. Spivey

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory V. Smith appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Spivey, No. 1:12-cv-00029-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 27 & Apr. 15, 2018). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.