U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Burgess

United States v. Burgess
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 12, 2013 · Davis, Duncan, Gregory
546 F. App'x 197

United States v. Burgess

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Frisalyn Burgess appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8 (D.S.C. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.