U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Strom

United States v. Strom
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 22, 2013 · Floyd, Hamilton, Wynn
546 F. App'x 303

United States v. Strom

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Justin Deonta Strom seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to appoint counsel filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013 action). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Strom seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense -with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.