U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Donnie Austin

United States v. Donnie Austin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 22, 2013 · Motz, Shedd, Duncan
514 F. App'x 376

United States v. Donnie Austin

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donnie J. Austin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Austin, No. 3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.