U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Arnold Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours

Arnold Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 28, 2013

Arnold Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2403

ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00711-JAG)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. *

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

PER CURIAM: Arnold Benson Clarke appeals the district court’s orders denying his complaint and amended complaint alleging claims of breach of contract, patent infringement, fraud, conspiracy, and racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours, No. 3:12-cv-00711-JAG (E.D. Va. Oct. 22 & Nov. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.