William Cloud v. United States
William Cloud v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6047
WILLIAM ROOSEVELT CLOUD, Petitioner – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; KURT W. MEYERS; MICHAEL SAVAGE; KENNETH RANDALL; FRANK D. WHITNEY, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00775-RJC)
Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013
Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Roosevelt Cloud, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Roosevelt Cloud appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cloud v. United States, No. 3:12-cv-00775-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.