U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

William Cloud v. United States

William Cloud v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2013

William Cloud v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6047

WILLIAM ROOSEVELT CLOUD, Petitioner – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; KURT W. MEYERS; MICHAEL SAVAGE; KENNETH RANDALL; FRANK D. WHITNEY, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:12-cv-00775-RJC)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Roosevelt Cloud, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William Roosevelt Cloud appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cloud v. United States, No. 3:12-cv-00775-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.