U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Janison Veal

United States v. Janison Veal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2013

United States v. Janison Veal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JANISON VEAL, a/k/a Jason, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00043-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janison Veal, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Janison Veal appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Veal, No. 3:02-cr-00043-JPB- JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.