U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Sung Kim v. Leon Panetta

Sung Kim v. Leon Panetta
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2013

Sung Kim v. Leon Panetta

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2311

SUNG KUN KIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEON E. PANETTA, Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Defense, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01370-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sung Kun Kim, Appellant Pro Se. David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Julie Ann Edelstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sung Kun Kim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer in Kim’s action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kim v. Panetta, No. 1:11-cv-01370-LMB- TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.