U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Jerel Shaw v. Aramark Management Services

Jerel Shaw v. Aramark Management Services
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2013

Jerel Shaw v. Aramark Management Services

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2344

JEREL SHAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv-00483-REP)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerel Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Lee Hoekman, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jerel Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP (E.D.

Va. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.