U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Hazel Ross

United States v. Hazel Ross
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2013

United States v. Hazel Ross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8132

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAZEL L. ROSS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (7:09-cr-00890-JMC-3)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hazel L. Ross, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Hazel L. Ross appeals the district court’s order denying her second motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 7:09-cr-00890-JMC-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.