U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Allen Wright v. Dr. Bearden

Allen Wright v. Dr. Bearden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2013

Allen Wright v. Dr. Bearden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7995

ALLEN WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. BEARDEN; DR. MOORE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-03307-TLW)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Allen Wright appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district court’s orders. Wright v. Bearden, No. 1:11-cv-03307-TLW (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2012; dated Nov. 2, 2012, entered Nov. 5, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.