U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Keith Frazier

United States v. Keith Frazier
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2013

United States v. Keith Frazier

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8147

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-6308

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cr-00113-F-1)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 11, 2013

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Edward Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Keith Edward Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his pro se motions to withdraw his guilty plea. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Frazier seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.