Donte Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad
Donte Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2368
DONTE R. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LAW OFFICE OF JOHN W. CONRAD III, LLC; JOHN W. CONRAD, III; GINA NOGLE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03050-RDB)
Submitted: April 10, 2013 Decided: April 12, 2013
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donte R. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John W. Conrad, III, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN W. CONRAD III, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Donte R. Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC, No. 1:12-cv-03050-RDB (Oct. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.