U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Raoul Lafond

United States v. Raoul Lafond
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 22, 2013

United States v. Raoul Lafond

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAOUL LAFOND, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (6:96-cr-00212-WO-1)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Raoul Lafond appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lafond, No. 6:96-cr-00212-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2012). Additionally, we deny Lafond’s motion for release pending appeal, for an en banc hearing, and for this court to assume jurisdiction over his motion pending in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.