United States v. Roderick Williams
United States v. Roderick Williams
Opinion
*154 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Roderick Lamar Williams appeals the district court’s order denying him a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion to place this appeal in abeyance, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 5:03-cr-00004-RLV-DSC-8 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court indicated that it entered the order upon motion of the defendant, we note that the court entered the order upon its own motion. Because Williams is not entitled to a sentence reduction, however, we conclude that remand to correct this error would be pointless.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.