U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Antonio Lewis

United States v. Antonio Lewis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 2013

United States v. Antonio Lewis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6227

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTONIO CHESTER LEWIS, a/k/a Big Tony, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00107-JAG-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Chester Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Antonio Chester Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2010). We conclude that the district court properly determined that Lewis was ineligible for a sentence reduction because his sentencing range was determined by his career offender designation, not the drug quantities attributable to him, and thus was not impacted by Amendment 750.

United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Lewis, No. 3:05-cr-00107-JAG-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.