U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Antrell Fordham v. Dr. Moore

Antrell Fordham v. Dr. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 2013

Antrell Fordham v. Dr. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6172

ANTRELL JERMAINE FORDHAM, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a Antrell J. Fordham, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. MOORE; MRS. L. MAUNEY; MRS. E. HOLCOMB, individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00974-MGL)

Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antrell Jermaine Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Shelton Webber Haile, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Antrell Jermaine Fordham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fordham v. Moore, No. 2:12-cv-00974-MGL (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.