U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Mark Barnes v. David Whitted

Mark Barnes v. David Whitted
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 7, 2013

Mark Barnes v. David Whitted

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8164

MARK ANTHONY BARNES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DAVID WHITTED, Deputy Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; H.

K. REVELEY, JR., Private Attorney, Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01340-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: April 24, 2013 Decided: May 7, 2013

Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee David Whitted.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Mark Anthony Barnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Whitted, No. 1:12-cv-01340- LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2012). We deny Barnes’s motions to appoint counsel, dismiss a party, for production of documents, to hold a settlement conference and to amend a cause of action.

Finally, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.