U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Arthur Armstrong v. Quentin Sumner

Arthur Armstrong v. Quentin Sumner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 10, 2013

Arthur Armstrong v. Quentin Sumner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1420

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; RACHEL JOYNER, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00425-F)

Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: May 10, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.