U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Leroy Ingram

United States v. Leroy Ingram
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 22, 2013

United States v. Leroy Ingram

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LEROY N. INGRAM, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:05-cr-00500-HEH-1)

Submitted: May 8, 2013 Decided: May 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy N. Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Leroy N. Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ingram, No. 3:05-cr-00500-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.