U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Maurice B. Quarles, Jr.

United States v. Maurice B. Quarles, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 2013 · Niemeyer, King, Agee
521 F. App'x 192

Counsel

Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Maurice B. Quarles, Jr.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice B. Quarles, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Quarles, No. 3:08-cr-00868-JAG-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.