Vicki Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership
Vicki Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2527
VICKI A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.; WESTERN INDUSTRIES-SOUTH, LLC; JOHN DOE # 1, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Wright Feehan, KUTAK ROCK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Janeen Beth Koch, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court’s orders denying her three separate Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions seeking reconsideration of the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendants in her action alleging premises liability and negligent application of a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2012, Jan. 3, 2013, & Jan. 31, 2013). We deny Lindsey’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and her motion to recuse several judges of this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.