Edward Bowie v. Henderson Police Department
Edward Bowie v. Henderson Police Department
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2448
EDWARD BOWIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants – Appellees.
No. 13-1131
EDWARD BOWIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00514-FL)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dep’t, No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.