U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Dianna Peterman v. Pat Causey

Dianna Peterman v. Pat Causey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2013

Dianna Peterman v. Pat Causey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1338

DIANNA PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. PAT CAUSEY; ELIZABETH SPILLMAN; MELINDA NORMAN; RICHARD GENTRY; ALICIA STORIE; HEATHER HENNESSEE; CASEY PUETT; AIMEE FAIRCHILD; JOHN BOYD; ROBERT BRADY; C. V. MORRIS; RALPH D. YOUNT; ALAN LECROY; LAURA GENTRY; UNKNOWN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00029-RLV)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dianna Peterman, B.P., Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Dianna Peterman and B.P., a minor child, appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and remanding child custody proceedings to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterman v. Causey, No. 5:13-cv-00029-RLV (W.D.N.C. Mar.

8, 2013). We also deny Peterman’s motion for a stay of the state court proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.