U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. David Zebrowski

United States v. David Zebrowski
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2013

United States v. David Zebrowski

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6257

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David Zebrowski appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zebrowski, No. 3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.