U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Demar Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney

Demar Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2013

Demar Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6085

DEMAR WORRELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WAYNE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; MOUNT OLIVE POLICE DEPARTMENT; BRANSON VICKORY, III; MIKE RICKS; LT. TOMMY BROWN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03121-FL)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 29, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demar Worrell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Demar Worrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Worrell v. Wayne County District Attorney’s Office, No. 5:12-ct-03121-FL (E.D.N.C., Dec. 6, 2012). We deny as moot Worrell’s motion to expedite decision.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.