U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Malcolm Young

United States v. Malcolm Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 31, 2013 · Motz, Agee, Hamilton
521 F. App'x 309

United States v. Malcolm Young

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Carl Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 5:09-cr-00036-GEC-JGW-1 (W.D.Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral ar *310 gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.