U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Malcolm Muhammad v. Dr. Tatro

Malcolm Muhammad v. Dr. Tatro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 31, 2013

Malcolm Muhammad v. Dr. Tatro

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6192

MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DR. L. TATRO; K. GIVENS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00043-SGW-RSB)

Submitted: May 26, 2013 Decided: May 31, 2013

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Tatro, No. 7:12-cv-00043-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.