United States v. Marty Wright
United States v. Marty Wright
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8056
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1)
Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Marty Lorenzo Wright appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a “Writ of Coram Nobis.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wright, No. 4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.