U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Thomas Tweh v. Robert Greene

Thomas Tweh v. Robert Greene
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 4, 2013

Thomas Tweh v. Robert Greene

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6002

THOMAS N. TWEH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT GREENE; CAPTAIN PAYNE; SERGEANT JEFFERS; SERGEANT TATE; DOCTOR DADGAR; ANTHONY STURGESS; DOCTOR DAVARIS; P.A.

D. STANSBURY; DEPUTY SHERIFF GREEN; DEPUTY SHERIFF SANGCO; CORPORAL MUHAMMAD, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02360-GLR)

Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas N. Tweh, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Roger L. Wolfe, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Thomas N. Tweh seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Tweh seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.