Donald McDaniels v. Harold Clarke
Donald McDaniels v. Harold Clarke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6087
DONALD E. MCDANIELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD E. CLARKE, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00614-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: May 30, 2013 Decided: June 4, 2013
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald E. McDaniels, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Donald E. McDaniels appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. McDaniels v. Clarke, No. 2:12- cv-00614-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.