U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Thomas Isbell

United States v. Thomas Isbell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2013 · Shedd, Diaz, Thacker
522 F. App'x 204

United States v. Thomas Isbell

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. Isbell appeals the district court’s order denying a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Isbell, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-DSC-18 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.