U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Evelyn Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company

Evelyn Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2013

Evelyn Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1549

EVELYN R. SINKLER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, and CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: June 10, 2013 Decided: June 14, 2013

Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea Rose Simmons, S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, PC, Carmel, Indiana, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler’s claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Ins. Co., No. 1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2013). We also deny as moot the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.