U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Ronnell Blount

United States v. Ronnell Blount
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2013

United States v. Ronnell Blount

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RONNELL DEVON BLOUNT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00375-JRS-1)

Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnell Devon Blount, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ronnell Devon Blount appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * United States v. Blount, No. 3:08-cr-00375-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although our calculation of Blount’s total offense level under Amendment 750 is one level lower than the district court’s, under neither calculation is Blount eligible for a reduction of his sentence. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.