U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck

Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2013

Sebastian Moore v. Theodis Beck

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6236

SEBASTIAN X. MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THEODIS BECK, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03093-BO)

Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sebastian X. Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Beck, No. 5:11-ct-03093-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.