U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

William Davis, II v. Albert Singer

William Davis, II v. Albert Singer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2013

William Davis, II v. Albert Singer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1649

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II; BABY J.F.D., c/o William S.

Davis, II; ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ALBERT J. SINGER; WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT; DANIELLE DOYLE; SYDNEY J. BATCH; BATCH, POORE & WILLIAMS; MICHELE JAWORSKI SUAREZ; MELANIE A. SHEKITA; MICHELLE SAVAGE; ERIC CRAIG CHASSE; LISA SELLERS; CHARLOTTE MITCHELL; WENDY KIRWAN; SONJI CARLTON; NANCEY BERSON; SUSAN GARVEY, Doctor; ROBERT B. RADAR; MARGARET EAGLES; RICHARD CROUTHARMEL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00007-RBS-DEM)

Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for an order to file exhibits under seal, motions to appoint counsel, and motions for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Davis’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.