Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss Kennedy’s civil complaint for failure to state a claim. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We review de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, “assuming all well-pleaded, non-eon-clusory factual allegations in the complaint to be true.” Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc., 658 F.3d 388, 391 (4th Cir. 2011); see Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570, *278 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (identifying standard for stating a claim). Having done so, we affirm the judgment of the district court, agreeing that each of Kennedy’s claims is either factually or legally deficient. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.